This week’s announcement of what was described as a “world leading” trial to test AI tools for examining breast cancer scans seemed like really good news.
I found this great stuff for that - Excilor Nail Fungus Treatment - worked for me but you may have to keep applying it. And it takes a long time because basically the old nail bad has to grow out, and is replaced by healthy nail.
The beauty of AI breast scanning is that it's almost risk free, because a human is cross-checking. We will never have enough radiologists to do all the scans we'd like to, and we humans are fallible - we all get tired, so it will probably make far less mistakes.
I've heard repeatedly and seen a documentary where a specialist said that about 75% of detected breast cancers would never develop into anything (eg no symptoms, no problems, no risk), but they don't know which 75% so they treat them all. What concerns me about finding more of them using AI is that this number of unnecessary treatments would rise to 90% - but they don't know which 90% would be fine without surgery/chemo - so they treat them all.
Health and science are the two sectors where AI is making tremendous strides. But it still has its glitches. New technology must be thoroughly assessed before it is unleashed on an unwitting public and local authorities must be certain it works as planned.
Doctors cannot even cure nail fungus…..somehow I don’t believe AI will cure anything.
I found this great stuff for that - Excilor Nail Fungus Treatment - worked for me but you may have to keep applying it. And it takes a long time because basically the old nail bad has to grow out, and is replaced by healthy nail.
😂
The beauty of AI breast scanning is that it's almost risk free, because a human is cross-checking. We will never have enough radiologists to do all the scans we'd like to, and we humans are fallible - we all get tired, so it will probably make far less mistakes.
I've heard repeatedly and seen a documentary where a specialist said that about 75% of detected breast cancers would never develop into anything (eg no symptoms, no problems, no risk), but they don't know which 75% so they treat them all. What concerns me about finding more of them using AI is that this number of unnecessary treatments would rise to 90% - but they don't know which 90% would be fine without surgery/chemo - so they treat them all.
Health and science are the two sectors where AI is making tremendous strides. But it still has its glitches. New technology must be thoroughly assessed before it is unleashed on an unwitting public and local authorities must be certain it works as planned.