I appreciate that you've come forward with corrections on your earlier reporting in 2016, but I still feel this post falls very short of calling a spade a spade. It is inadequate to characterize Craig Wright as having failed to prove he's Satoshi; indeed, he's very much proven he is, without a doubt, a completely fraudulent con man.
This is a man who has been called a liar by 7 different judges on 3 continents, been proven to have submitted numerous forgeries in court, massively plagiarized every academic article he has published (including copy/pasting graphs from ornithologists in the dodgy PhD he was awarded in 2017 to justify the "Dr." title he had been flaunting for ten years before that), and every apparent link he's claimed to the early bitcoin scene has been shown to be fabricated.
I appreciate that you've come forward with corrections on your earlier reporting in 2016, but I still feel this post falls very short of calling a spade a spade. It is inadequate to characterize Craig Wright as having failed to prove he's Satoshi; indeed, he's very much proven he is, without a doubt, a completely fraudulent con man.
This is a man who has been called a liar by 7 different judges on 3 continents, been proven to have submitted numerous forgeries in court, massively plagiarized every academic article he has published (including copy/pasting graphs from ornithologists in the dodgy PhD he was awarded in 2017 to justify the "Dr." title he had been flaunting for ten years before that), and every apparent link he's claimed to the early bitcoin scene has been shown to be fabricated.